According to the Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2014, 51.9% of children in grade 5 are unable to read a simple grade 2 level text. While India’s education problems in the aggregate might seem bad, it is considerably worse in Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state. According to ASER 2014, 16.5% of 5 years old children were not enrolled in school (pre-school or school) compared to 3.5% in Himachal Pradesh. As India’s most populous state the actual size, the significance for India’s youth on aggregate is immense. It means that the demographic dividend that commentators of India’s destiny speak of – might become a demographic disappointment. On the doorsteps of villages across are the little projects of the technological enterprises – some of them remarkable and many giving evidence of the looming threat that technology poses to these young children. They will either get on top of it or will succumb to it’s conquest - and to what situation I am not sure.
In the time that I spent in the field, what struck me the most was the innocence and the brutal injustices faced by children – not because they were forced into hard labour or kept away from school – but if I were to be vocal about the statistics presented above, it would be to point out that many of these children were being left behind; that despite being in school (India has an enrollment rate of 97%), they were not learning anything. Many of them set about their days completely lost and unable to even do simple reading and arithmetic. They lose confidence in their ability to understand and persevere or even enjoy their educational journey.
Not unlike it's colonial past - India's education system favors the 'cream' in the name of a deeply flawed meritocracy.
This is why programs and efforts like R&D are important. To me, R&D was a program that challenged the very foundation of the education system and the role of the numerous stakeholders in a child’s journey. It takes children in public schools in Uttar Pradesh (and Bihar) in grades 1 and 2 – exposing them to a curriculum and structure that takes into account the lack of pre-school experience and redefines the role of a teacher from it’s traditional set up – to one where he or she is part of the community.
There were many discussions about the general cost of such a program and while I could visible compare the strengths of the R&D program to that of the ‘current state’, in my purview of what programs in other parts of the world were doing – Pratham’s R&D is one of the cheapest and perhaps considerably more innovative and relevant to the local context.