Activity 1
Reflection questions:

1) When I was playing the game I felt...
2) What did you like about the game.
3) What did you not like about the game.
4) As a player the game is good or not good because....
5) As a player I would change the game by....
6) As an observer or someone watching people play the game, the game is good or not good because...
7) As an observer I would change the game by...
8) I would give the game a mark of ____ out of 10.

Uno
1.I felt Competitive.
2.I liked how you can use power ups to lessen the chance of other players winning.
3.I didnt see anything i didnt like in the game. The game was pretty fun.
4.As a player the game is good because you can pass time with your friends if your bored.
5.As a player i would change the game by adding more powerups to make the game more fun and exciting.
6.As an observer, the game is not that good because Its not really fun just watching the game.
7. As an observer i would change the game by
8.I would give a mark of 8 out of 10



Speed
1.I felt really quick and active.
2.I liked the fact that you need to be the first one to finish your deck.
3.I didnt like how fast paced the game is.
4.As a player the game is good cause it makes our mind think faster.
5.As a player i would change the game by adding some handicaps.
6.As an observer the game is good cause you wont wait that long for a turn to play and its still fun even by watching.
7.As an observer i would change it to make it have 3 players or more.
8.I would give a mark of 10 out of 10.


Apples to Apples.
What i felt during this game is a fun. I liked the fact that we can pick to describe what card is in our hands. I didnt like how the game included some people who I dont know cause ill describe them. As a player the game is good cause it is fun to play it with friends. If i would change the game ill change how the judge chooses the winner. As an observer the game is good if youre watching your friends play. As an obeserver the game is really good as it is so i wont change it. I would rate the game 8 out of 10.


Scattergories.
What I felt challenged during this game, i started thinking about hard words.I liked how the game makes you think of random words starting with a certain letter. What i didnt ike about the game is that some letters is hard to name. As a player the game is good because theres a timer to think of words so the game can progress quickly, I would change the game by adding more hard questions to name. As an Observer the game is good cause sometimes its funny to see people make up words that they dont know. I wouldnt change anything if i was an observer. I would rate the game 8 out of 10.


I felt good playing this game. I like how the game progress and giving us all chances. I didnt like how the game makes people greedy in someways. As a player the game is good cause it has really good pieces and it helps you count. I would change the game by having another jail or giving more chances. As an observer the game is really boring sometimes. I would change the game by making the game faster so i can play next. I would rate the game 7 out of 10.

Scrabble 
I felt really bored during this game. I like how we think of words to use. I didnt like how long and boring it takes for a player to take a turn. As a player the game is not good because it is so boring for me. i would change the game by adding some more rules to it to make it more fun. As an observer the game is much more boring cause you just watch people make up and connect words. Id rate this game 3 out of 10.

Connect 4
This game feels alright. I like how you both take turns and have strategies to win. I really liked everything about this game. As a player the game is good because its simple and fun. I wouldnt change anything about it. As an observer the game is really not that fun but the game progress fast so its ok. I wouldnt change the game as an obeserver. I would rate this game 8 out of 10.

Jenga
This game feels ok. I like how we stack up the blocks after we get some from the bottom. I liked everything about it. As a player the game is good because its a challenge not to make the tower fall. I wouldnt change anything about it. Its really original. As an Observer The game is good because you can see them play hard. I would rate the game 9 out of 10.

Activity 2

Jenga
Originality- Jenga is the first game I saw that has that mechanic. I say its quite unique.
Freshness- By means of freshness its ok. The game can be playable over and over again for a while to pass time, just as long as it doesnt take that long.
Surprise- Its a surprising and an intense game because you will never know when the tower will fall.
Equal opportunity- Every player take turns in pulling blocks out of the tower so its equal.
Winning Chances- Wining here is not that accurate because theres no winner, theres only a loser, and the chances of losing is not that accurate.
There is really no 'king maker effect" because its possible that you will not be a loser round per round.
And theres really no early elimination too because a player is never eliminated during a game.
Uniformity- The title jenga is derived from a Swahili word meaning "build". and the game is about building a tower out of blocks from it.
Quality of components- its a high quality game cause the block is strong.
Target groups and consistency of rules- jengas target groups isnt really accurate cause anyone can enjoy the game as long as your older than 6. Its rules are pretty simple.
Complexity- The game has simple mechanics and rules.




Speed
Originality- speed is the first game I saw that has that mechanic.But its card isnt that original cause you can play lots of game with that deck.
Freshness- It can be boring if you play it over and over again.
Surprise- its surprise factor is not that good. theres nothing surprising in this game.
Equal opportunity- This game is equal every player has a turn to take out cards from thier hand.
Winning Chances- The fastest and smartest will always win for sure.
King maker effect- The Smart and fast one always win.
Theres no early elimination because there is only 2 players. Its either you win or lose.

Uniformity- Its title matches its mechanics you need speed in order to win.
Quality of components- Its cards isnt top quality speed is a game you can play as long as you have a deck of 1-king.
Target groups and consistency of rules- Its a game of chance where you can win if your faster than your opponent so its going to be a bad game for kids cause they wont have much fun.
Complexity- Its rules are very simple, add cards next to the number.

Activity 3
Reflection Questions

1) The good thing about our game is that it can be competitive cause instead of using power ups for yourself you have some traps for your opponents.
2) The appearance of the board and cards.
3) A board game that I played that was good was Thats so Random because its really fun to play.
4) I would give my game a mark out of 8 out of 10
5) I would give myself a mark out of 8 out of 10 because I thought of lots of things and made most part of the board.
6) I would give my partner a mark out of 8 out of 10 because he helped me writing the rules and correcting some stuff about the game.
7) I learned making a game was really hard and takes lots of time to prepare,brainstorm,design,and make fun content.






Unit 1
Published:

Unit 1

Unit 1

Published: