Henry Elibekyan
1956. Tbilissi. Years of study of acting and directing; attendingdrawing lessons at the Academy of Arts by ProfessorVassili Shukhayev, a remarkable artist just released from “Gulag” into“freedom.” Those were the years of finding my place in painting, sculpture andtheatre. Under Meyerkhold’s influence, I searched for my path, but alas, undera totalitarian regime where one constantly felt the presence of a repressivemachine, the search of an “exit” and self-realization was nothing but an“illusion.”
1962. Yerevan.Years of study at the department of fine arts; frequent meetings with Minas,Henrik Igityan, Kochar, admiration of great Arshile Gorky opened up new vistasfor me. During these years, I created a series of works in the spirit of “popart” entitled “Man in Space” that were exhibited, in a year, in the Artists’House at a two-day exhibition which caused a tremendous outrage.
Igitian’s statements during that scary, “nightmarish” period did notfall short of roughness either. Kochar, Minas and a group of artists togethershaped contemporary Armenian art in the context of global standards. Igityan’s contribution to thiscause is hard to underestimate. An outstanding manager, a wonderful art critic,politician and diplomat, he made possible the creation and commissioning of theMuseum of Contemporary Art in Yerevan in 1972.
Minas is a great artist, a master of color, sign, symbol, aquintessential philosopher. YervandKochar was a philosopher, the “father” of contemporary Armenian art, a greatsculptor and painter, a pioneer of “painting in space” trend that he started inParis in the1930’s.
I created the system of “Painting Plus Sculpture in Time and Space”in Moscow in1970, not without Kochar’s influence. The system is about models moving inspace, in interaction of three categories: speed of the light, pulsation of theform, transformation of the shape.
Many of my colleagues lack the courage to admit the existence ofsuccession of tradition which is a norm for many civilized nations. Some ofthem, self-proclaimed discoverers, view global culture through a keyhole; theybenefit from the experience of their “neighbours,” and then destroy them, to“cover up traces.”