Alibaba – In addition to professional skills, we also need to pay attention to cooperation
Alibaba's interview was quite satisfactory. The information provided by the headhunter at that time was that the person in charge of the position had been transferred to other business lines and had been vacant. The business side had urgent requirements and had requirements for the base location.
However, what confused me very HE Tuber much during the interview at Alibaba was that HR was present, and I only communicated with the business once. It was said that he was the big leader responsible for auditing security. In the process of communicating with HR, the actual business discussions are very limited, and most of them involve cooperation with others. This shows that the employment situation in large factories is not just about business capabilities, but also about teamwork.
Baidu – Good questions come from self-awareness
Although Baidu's business lines are not that eye-catching compared to positions in other companies at the same time, it happened during the frustrating process when I didn't have an offer and was rejected many times. Objectively, it provided me with a certain spiritual value in continuing to invest in interviews. , Based on this, I will also briefly explain the situation of this business.
Baidu's main focus is search, but in its historical development, it not only does core indexing, but also creates its own content. Therefore, it also has a certain acumen in the construction of content ecology, especially as the domestic content ecology tends to be short videos and live streaming media. Under the form, there is still room for lack of supply for some long-tail Q&A. Different from Zhihu-type business scenarios, Baidu's long-tail mainly solves some very vertical segmentation problems. This field is also the most prone to problems such as irregular content generation and lack of authenticity.
Asking questions in the two stages of the interview made me feel that the information I asked was in line with the other party’s expectations, and it directly determined that the process could be continued:
During the business leader’s interview question-and-answer session , I directly asked what issues I am currently paying more attention to in terms of content management? What are the core issues to be solved at this stage? Why arrange resources that way. This question is actually a double-edged sword. If the previous conversation is very harmonious, it is a bonus. If the interviewer is not satisfied with the content of the previous communication, if you ask this question during the question period, you will be directly rejected with "no comment."
I was more confident at that time because of several characteristics:
When introducing business details earlier, I highlighted structured expressions. For example, how can I clearly introduce to the interviewer the difficulties and challenges at work and what are the abilities behind them?
Show your own in-depth analysis on the determination of content risks. Maybe the direction may not be completely correct, but the actions and principles of disassembly are well-founded and full of logic.
In terms of past project communication experience, because the department I am applying for is relatively vertical, I rely on horizontal and cross-department resources. When introducing the project, I also objectively explained how I
The other question was from the leader of the entire team.
I asked, "If you have the opportunity to join, what strengths do you expect the candidate to contribute to this position?" The reason why I ask this question is because the previous communication business was very smooth, and there were almost no challenging problems.
But there will be two situations. One is that my answer is not on point at all, and the other party does not want to talk more, so I answer whatever it is, so no additional explanation is needed; the other is that every answer I give is clear and logical. Able to get the right direction. In order to identify clearly which one I am, I asked the above questions. Fortunately, the answer given by the interviewer was very related to my previous introduction. Sure enough, 30 minutes after my interview, HR made an appointment for my final interview with HRBP.
Based on this interview experience and combined with past experiences, I have a deeper understanding of my past resume.
Professionalism from an IC perspective: Cognition of pure new content genres, ability to locate the stage of the problem, and strategy design capabilities
Project management perspective: The ability to horizontally connect the businesses of all parties, involving goal alignment, task dismantling and manpower arrangement, and cycle progress management.
External communication and cooperation ability: Past work not only involved strategy
promotion, but also required liaison with various cooperation departments. Roles covered: compliance and legal affairs, PR/GR, algorithm research and development, product operations, human review base, and rules team communication
A good interview is like this. You can find your own sense of value in the process of external communication, and also sort out your cognition and vision in various dimensions.
Didi-Product Military Academy, dual challenges of professionalism and management
Didi’s position is also an international business, mainly building a feedback link for driver and passenger issues. From this perspective, it was the first time that I stood in the reporting feedback link and thought about how to proactively identify problems when the normal business process does not work. Issues that may be reported back.
The intuitive feeling of the interview is that it is very professional, with professional communication establishment, professional problem discussion, and professional problem feedback. There are two questions that are relatively big challenges for me. Later, I also discussed how to do it with several product friends. deal with:
