ICC is a student owned,
student run and administered non-profit organization, which is
devoted to providing affordable houses for students in Ann Arbor
area. Their website, icc.coop,
serves as a major information portal. There are four sections on the
website: Join (for prospective members), Learn (introducing ICC),
Live (for current members), and Remember (for alumni). The website
has hosted almost all information needed for prospective members,
current residents and staff. Nevertheless, despite the importance the
website plays in promoting ICC, ICC doesn’t own feedback from users
for its website since its launch in 2003.
At the request and
supervision of Member Services Director and Web Administrator of
Inter-Cooperative Council (ICC), we conducted this usability test for
ICC’s current website since October 2011. This study was to seek
patterns in first-time visitors’ information seeking behaviors, as
well as find usability issues at ICC website. We recruited four users
to test the website based on the scenario we had wrote with the ICC
web team. Participants were then required to fill out a questionnaire
to test their learning outcome.
In our study, we found
that participants have different information seeking patterns; they
would use other website such as Google Maps to help them get
information. The Houses page and the FAQ page are two heavy visited
pages. Our study shows that participants paid attention only to
information related to their own application and ignore other pages
such as “About ICC”, yet the majority of the first-time visitors
are able to gain general understanding of ICC either by common sense
or from information provided at pages they’d visited. When they
could not or did not want to find information by their own,
participants usually chose to ask the house president by email.
Our study indicates that there are many
usability issues at ICC website that may affect first-visitors’
experience. Participants had experienced mediate level of struggles
in completing the tasks we gave them, which often accompanied by
confusion and misinterpretation. Languages and labels may be too hard
to understand especially for international students whose native
language is not English. The website is text-heavy, which may cause
difficulty in finding useful information quickly. In addition,
participants pointed out inconsistency in navigation system and task
workflow. In the end, the website’s interface design has potential
to be improved.
Based on our study, we generate several
recommendations that include: (1) seek user experience professionals’
advices when redesign the website, and (2) integrate usability test
and user experience evaluation into the website redesign cycle.
Discuss This Project: ( Comments)